1. Purpose
Standardise male‑specific dermal filler planning and technique to achieve natural, structurally defined, and proportionally balanced outcomes while meeting Australian regulatory and patient‑safety requirements. 1 4 6 8
2. Scope
Applies to licensed injectors operating within scope under Newcastle Cosmetic Doctor. Covers assessment, planning, product rheology, region‑specific technique, ultrasound use, complication management, and governance.1 6 8
3. Anatomical Principles of the Male Face
Male faces typically present larger craniofacial dimensions, stronger supraorbital ridges, wider bizygomatic and bigonial widths, flatter malar projection (less anterior zygomatic apex), a squarer, broader chin, and thicker, more sebaceous skin. Ageing patterns feature skeletal resorption with lateral > anterior midface support needs; periorbital and midface correction should be conservative to avoid feminisation.12 5 21
4. Pre‑Treatment Assessment (Male‑specific)
- Photographs: frontal, oblique, profile, chin‑down/up; dynamic expressions.
- Intent: emphasise angularity and width (zygoma, jawline) over anterior cheek projection.
- Dental/occlusion & bruxism: chin shape/projected pogonion; avoid filler where occlusal issues dominate—consider referral.
- Beard/hairline patterns: plan entry points and scar camouflage.
- Skin quality: sebaceous density, pores; anticipate oedema and hydrophilicity responses.
- Psychology & consent: proportionate screening for unrealistic expectations/BDD; 7‑day cooling‑off for <18s; advertising restrictions.
Comply with Ahpra non‑surgical cosmetic procedure guidelines and advertising rules.1 3 2
5. Product Rheology & Injection Depth
Prefer higher G′, cohesive gels or CaHA for structure (jawline, chin, lateral cheek/zygoma). Select lower hydrophilicity formulations to minimise puffiness. Place in deep supraperiosteal or sub‑SMAS planes for contour; reserve superficial planes for fine blending only. Ultrasound can confirm plane and avoid vessels.2 13 16 17
6. Region‑Specific Technique Modifications (Men)
6.1 Cheek / Zygoma
Goal: lateral width and ogee flattening rather than anterior cheekball. Technique: microbolus or short linear threads over zygomatic arch (deep), avoid excessive anterior malar apex; blend laterally into preauricular/zygoma.10 12
6.2 Jawline (Angle → Body → Chin—prejowl)
Goal: straight, firm mandibular border with defined gonial angle. Technique: deep supraperiosteal microbolus at angle; subcutaneous linear threads along mandibular body; address pre‑/post‑jowl hollows.14 15 13
6.3 Chin (Width and projection, not pointiness)
Goal: broaden base and square silhouette. Technique: supraperiosteal bolus at pogonion with paramedian support; conservative central projection; respect labiomental angle.11 18
6.4 Nose (Non‑surgical rhinoplasty — advanced only)
Goal: correct dorsal irregularities while preserving a strong nasofrontal angle. High‑risk zone—prefer ultrasound guidance; micro‑aliquots; avoid high pressure/static bolus.19 20
6.5 Lips (Masculine restraint)
Aim for subtle definition and hydration; avoid excessive eversion or anterior projection. Vertical upper:lower lip proportions vary by sex and ethnicity; many male faces tolerate near‑equal vertical height (≈1:1) or modest lower‑lip dominance—use clinical judgement.22 23 24
6.6 Tear Trough / Periorbita (caution)
Conservative volumes; consider lateral midface support first. Prefer cannula or ultrasound guidance; avoid hydrophilic gels that swell.5 16
7. Dosing Guide by Region (Men) — indicative ranges
| Region | Plane | Aliquot size | Notes |
| Zygoma (lateral arch) | Deep supraperiosteal | 0.05–0.2 mL/point | Short linear threads/microbolus; avoid anterior malar ball 12 |
| Jaw angle | Supraperiosteal | 0.1–0.3 mL/point | High G′ HA or CaHA; sharp angle definition 13 14 15 |
| Mandibular body | Subcutaneous | 0.05–0.1 mL/cm | Retrograde threads; maintain straight border 13 15 |
| Chin (base width) | Supraperiosteal + subcutaneous | 0.05–0.2 mL/point | Paramedian support to square base 11 18 |
| Tear trough | Supraperiosteal/sub‑orbicularis | 0.02–0.05 mL/point | Conservative; consider cannula/US 5 16 |
| Lips (male) | Submucosal/subdermal | 0.01–0.03 mL/line | Definition > volume; minimal eversion 22 23 24 |
8. Safety & Risk Mitigation
- Ultrasound: map critical vessels pre‑procedure in high‑risk zones; consider real‑time guidance.
- Injection principles: small aliquots, slow/low‑pressure, correct plane, constant needle motion; avoid large static bolus.
- Aspiration is unreliable as a safety test—do not rely on it to permit risky bolus injections.
- Prefer cannula in some high‑risk zones but recognise it’s not fail‑safe (small‑gauge cannula behaves like needle).
- Immediate ocular pathway for any visual symptom; activate RANZCO protocol.
- Have hyaluronidase and anaphylaxis kit open and ready; rehearse drills.
Evidence and guidance: 16 25 26 9 10
9. Regulatory Compliance (Australia 2025)
- Ahpra non‑surgical cosmetic procedure guidelines in effect (2025) for performance and advertising.
- TGA: no public advertising of S4 prescription‑only injectables; ensure ARTG inclusion and device traceability (include UDI where available).
- RACGP IPC + ACSQHC/NSQHS standards for infection prevention, medication safety, clinical governance.
- Documentation: consent, batch/lot, ARTG/UDI, injection map and planes, ultrasound screenshots if used; adverse events → TGA IRIS/MDIR.
10. Complication Management (Fast Reference)
- Cutaneous vascular occlusion: stop, warm compress, massage; high‑dose pulsed hyaluronidase flooding throughout ischaemic field; repeat until reperfusion.
- Ocular symptoms: cease immediately; call 000; urgent ophthalmology transfer; follow RANZCO pre‑hospital guidance; do not delay with in‑clinic maneuvers.
- Anaphylaxis: adrenaline 1:1000 IM 0.5 mL; lay flat; high‑flow O₂; monitor; transfer to ED.
- Infection: follow RACGP/IPC; consider culture, antibiotics; document and review.
11. Audit & Training
- Quarterly: technique vs outcomes (region, product, dose, complications); peer review of 5 consecutive male cases.
- Annual: ultrasound mapping/injection refresh; anaphylaxis and ocular drills; VO simulation; document CPD aligned with Ahpra expectations.
Sources
- Ahpra (2025) Performing non‑surgical cosmetic procedures — Guidelines hub., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Resources/Cosmetic-surgery-hub/Cosmetic-procedure-guidelines.aspx ↩
- TGA (2025) Advertising health services and cosmetic injections — FAQ., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.tga.gov.au/products/regulations-all-products/advertising/specialised-advertising-issues-and-topics/advertising-health-services-and-cosmetic-injections-frequently-asked-questions-and-answers ↩
- Ahpra (2025) Advertising guidelines for higher‑risk non‑surgical cosmetic procedures., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.ahpra.gov.au/Resources/Cosmetic-surgery-hub/Cosmetic-procedure-advertising-guidelines.aspx ↩
- RACGP (2024) Infection prevention and control guidelines (primary care)., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.racgp.org.au/running-a-practice/practice-standards/racgp-infection-prevention-and-control-guidelines ↩
- Bannister JJ et al. (2022) Sex differences in adult facial 3D morphology. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/full/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0301 ↩
- ACSQHC (2021, updated 2024) NSQHS Standards (2nd ed.)., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-05/national_safety_and_quality_health_service_nsqhs_standards_second_edition_-_updated_may_2021.pdf ↩
- NHMRC/ACSQHC (2024) Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-01/australian_guidelines_for_the_prevention_and_control_of_infection_in_healthcare_current_version_v11.22_9_january_2024.pdf ↩
- Ahpra (2025) News — new guidelines in effect for non‑surgical cosmetic procedures., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2025-09-02-New-guidelines-for-cosmetic-procedures.aspx ↩
- RANZCO (2024) Filler Blindness Guidelines — pre‑hospital pathway., viewed 05 November 2025, https://ranzco.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/RANZCO-Filler-Blindness-Guidelines_2024.pdf ↩
- ASCIA (2024) Acute management of anaphylaxis — guideline., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.allergy.org.au/images/ASCIA_HP_Guidelines_Acute_Management_Anaphylaxis_2024.pdf ↩
- Chen B et al. (2022) Chin augmentation with hyaluronic acid: injection technique. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9241653/ ↩
- Bannister JJ, Juszczak H, Aponte JD, Katz DC, Knott PD, Weinberg SM, Hallgrímsson B, Forkert ND, Seth R (2022), Sex differences in adult facial three-dimensional morphology: Application to gender-affirming facial surgery, Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine, 24(S2): S24–S30, viewed 05 November 2025, https://doi.org/10.1089/fpsam.2021.0301 ↩
- Moradi A et al. (2023) CaHA best‑practice guidelines; jawline augmentation rationale. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10120162/ ↩
- Dallara JM (2014) Calcium hydroxylapatite for jawline rejuvenation. J Cosmet Dermatol., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24641600/ ↩
- Go BC et al. (2023) Using injectable fillers for chin and jawline rejuvenation. Dermatol Pract Concept., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10296042/ ↩
- Vasconcelos‑Berg R et al. (2024—2025) Best practices for high‑frequency ultrasound guidance for fillers. Diagnostics (MDPI)., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11353849/ ↩
- Jung JY et al. (2024—2025) Recommendations on ultrasound‑guided hyaluronic acid filler injections. J Cosmet Dermatol., viewed 05 November 2025, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jocd.16759 ↩
- Al‑Khafaji MQM et al. (2023) Review of HA for chin augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10719547/ ↩
- Bravo BSF et al. (2024) Nasal filling guided by high‑frequency ultrasound. J Cosmet Dermatol., viewed 05 November 2025, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16430 ↩
- FDA (2025) Executive Summary: dermal fillers risks and imaging guidance mentions., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.fda.gov/media/188185/download ↩
- Matthews HS et al. (2023) Data‑driven phenotyping of facial dimorphism. PLoS Comput Biol., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10335371/ ↩
- Kar M (2018) Is it possible to define the ideal lips? J Cutan Aesthet Surg., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5952987/ ↩
- de Queiroz Hernandez PM et al. (2023) Attractiveness vs lip ratios. Sci Rep., viewed 05 November 2025, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-31332-1 ↩
- Hasibuan LY et al. (2023) Comprehensive anthropometric lip measurements (men vs women). J Oral Maxillofac Res., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10825920/ ↩
- Goodman GJ (2021—2022) Aspiration before tissue filler — unreliable safety maneuver. Aesthet Surg J., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8670299/ ↩
- Goodman GJ et al. (2020) Neither positive nor negative aspiration should be relied upon. Aesthet Surg J., viewed 05 November 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7954536/ ↩


